Microjuris Puerto Rico
 
Favor entrar Usuario y/o Clave


 
Leyes
   LPRA-Índice Dinámico
   LPR-Catálogo de Leyes
   Reglas
   Reglamentos
Decisiones
   DPR-Tribunal Supremo
   TA-Tribunal de Apelaciones
Trámite Legislativo
   eLegislativo
   Informes Legislativos
Federal
   US Supreme Court
   Circuit Courts
   District Court (PR)
   Bankruptcy (PR)
   USC
   CFR
Doctrina
   Revistas
Compendia
   Laboral
   Contributivo
   Ambiental
Servicios
   AYUDA
   SherLAWck-Alerts
   Web Mail


 
Guardar Búsquedas
 MJPR_Apelativo
 

IntelliSearch


¿Su consulta es en inglés?No
  • Búsqueda por:

Filtrar por:

Colección  
  • Todas  
  • LPRA
  • LPR
  • DPR
  • Apelaciones
  • Reglamentos
  • Revistas
  • OSJ
  • eLegislativo
  • Supreme Court-Federal
  • Circuit Courts-Federal
  • 1st Circuit-Federal
  • District Court-Federal
  • Bankruptcy-Federal
  • USC-Federal
  • CFR-Federal
Inicio » Resultados
Cambiar Tamaño del Texto Crear PDF de esta página Enviar esta página por Email Imprimir esta página
 
MIC Gen. Ins. Co. v. Allen
MIC Gen. Ins. Co. v. Allen. SUMMARY ORDERRULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 14th day of June, two thousand seventeen.PRESENT: RICHARD C. WESLEY, SUSAN L. CARNEY, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY,
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|2nd Cir.  |  2017USCA317816936
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Breckinridge Health, Inc. v. Price
Breckinridge Health, Inc. v. Price. RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)File Name: 17a0126p.06Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville.No. 3:15-cv-00251-Joseph H. McKinley Jr., Chief District Judge.Before: GUY, SILER, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.COUNSELARGUED: David M. Dirr, DRESSMAN BENZINGER LAVELLE PS, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, for Appellants. Carleen M. Zubrzycki, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David M. Dirr, Mathew R. Klein, Richard G. Meyer, DRESSMAN BENZINGER LAVELLE PS, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, for Appellants. Carleen M. Zubrzycki, Michael S. Raab, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Page 2OPINIONBERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|6th Cir.  |  2017USCA1025325694
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
United States v. Manati
United States v. Manati. [DO NOT PUBLISH]D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00338-CAP-RGV-1Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of GeorgiaBefore JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges, and VINSON,* District Judge.Page 2 PER CURIAM:Enkeleon Manati appeals his convictions on one count of conspiracy to engage in alien smuggling for the purpose of financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I), and alien smuggling for the purpose of financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mr. Manati argues that the district court improperly admitted several pieces of evidence and improperly limited defense counsel's cross-examination of a key witness. He also asserts that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|11th Cir.  |  2017USCA1062655590
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre
United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre. Summary CalendarAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of TexasUSDC No. 2:16-CR-203-1Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM:*The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Rodriguez-Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Aguirre has filed a response.We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez-Aguirre's response. We concur withPage 2 counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|5th Cir.  |  2017USCA798830843
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Ruano-Perez v. Sessions
Ruano-Perez v. Sessions. Summary CalendarPetition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration AppealsBIA No. A098 963 948Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM:*After she failed to appear at her October 25, 2005 removal hearing, Dalia Jazmin Ruano-Perez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, was ordered removed from the United States in absentia. Nine years later, Ruano-Perez moved to reopen her removal proceedings and to rescind the in absentia removal order. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied the motion, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed her ensuing appeal. Ruano-Perez now petitions thisPage 2 court for review of the BIA's order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5). To the extent she complains that the BIA declined to exercise its sua sponte authority to
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|5th Cir.  |  2017USCA566326730
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Adkins v. Sogliuzzo
Adkins v. Sogliuzzo. NOT PRECEDENTIALOn Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey(District Court No. 2-09-cv-01123)District Judge: The Honorable Susan D. WigentonSubmitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)February 6, 2017Before: McKEE, COWEN, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.OPINION*Page 2 McKEE, Circuit Judge.Jane Adkins appeals the District Court's order denying her request for damages in her diversity action against her brother, John Sogliuzzo, for mismanagement of Mary Grimley's estate. Adkins argues she and the estate are entitled to $391,040.05 in damages because Sogliuzzo is liable for undue influence, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, fraud, and misrepresentation for taking cash from Grimley's home for himself and
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|3rd Cir.  |  2017USCA1533199607
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Seaberg v. Steak N' Shake Operations, Inc.
Seaberg v. Steak N' Shake Operations, Inc.. [DO NOT PUBLISH]Non-Argument CalendarD.C. Docket No. 5:13-cv-00634-WTH-PRLAppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of FloridaBefore WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM: Page 2 Following a three-day jury trial in a slip-and-fall case resulting in a favorable verdict for appellee Karen Seaberg, Steak N' Shake Operations, Inc. (SNS) appeals the district court's denial of its motion for a judgment as a matter of law and its motion for a new trial. SNS first challenges the determination of Seaberg's legal status at the time of her injury, arguing that she was an uninvited licensee, not a business invitee and that, in any case, the question of her legal status should have been submitted to the jury instead of being decided by the district court. SNS further argues that
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|11th Cir.  |  2017USCA1244929862
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
United States v. Rodriguez-Trevino
United States v. Rodriguez-Trevino. Summary CalendarAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasUSDC No. 3:15-CR-528-1Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM:*Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Gerardo Rodriguez-Trevino raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternativePage 2 motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|5th Cir.  |  2017USCA721302904
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
United States v. Shawn House
United States v. Shawn House. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATIONFile Name: 17a0336n.06ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGANBEFORE: COOK, KETHLEDGE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.COOK, Circuit Judge. Defendant Shawn House appeals his sentence for conspiring to sell oxycodone. We AFFIRM.I. Background FactsFrom 2011 to 2014, House ran a drug-trafficking operation that specialized in distributing oxycodone pills. The operation obtained the pills from a Michigan pain clinic's patients, and employed drug runners to transport the oxycodone to House's network of dealers in Ohio. Once the dealers completed their sales, they remitted the proceeds to the runners, who delivered the drug money to House and fetched the next batch of
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|6th Cir.  |  2017USCA281274507
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
United States v. Becerra
United States v. Becerra. Summary CalendarAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of TexasUSDC No. 2:15-CR-742-2Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM:*The attorney appointed to represent Juan Becerra, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Becerra has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Becerra's claims of ineffective assistance ofPage 2 counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.
14-jun-2017 |  US Court of Appeals|5th Cir.  |  2017USCA1955437396
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Resultados 1 al 10 de 4414676 (aprox.)Página: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>

Política de Privacidad |   Términos y Condiciones  |    @FaceBook |   @Twitter | Sitemap   |    Últimas entradas (RSS)   |    Blog Corporativo

INICIO

MI PERFIL

BÚSQUEDA POR:

QUÉ OFRECEMOS PRODUCTOS SERVICIOS AYUDA CONTÁCTANOS
 

» Prueba la nueva versión de Microjuris.com OK