Microjuris Puerto Rico
 
Favor entrar Usuario y/o Clave


 
Leyes
   LPRA-Índice Dinámico
   LPR-Catálogo de Leyes
   Reglas
   Reglamentos
Decisiones
   DPR-Tribunal Supremo
   TA-Tribunal de Apelaciones
Trámite Legislativo
   eLegislativo
   Informes Legislativos
Federal
   US Supreme Court
   Circuit Courts
   District Court (PR)
   Bankruptcy (PR)
   USC
   CFR
Doctrina
   Revistas
Compendia
   Laboral
   Contributivo
   Ambiental
Servicios
   AYUDA
   SherLAWck-Alerts
   Web Mail


 
Guardar Búsquedas
 MJPR_Apelativo
 

IntelliSearch


¿Su consulta es en inglés?No
  • Búsqueda por:

Filtrar por:

Colección  
  • Todas  
  • LPRA
  • LPR
  • DPR
  • Apelaciones
  • Reglamentos
  • Revistas
  • OSJ
  • eLegislativo
  • Supreme Court-Federal
  • Circuit Courts-Federal
  • 1st Circuit-Federal
  • District Court-Federal
  • Bankruptcy-Federal
  • USC-Federal
  • CFR-Federal
Inicio » Resultados
Cambiar Tamaño del Texto Crear PDF de esta página Enviar esta página por Email Imprimir esta página
 
Coop A/C Caguas v. Rivera (In re Rivera)
Coop A/C Caguas v. Rivera (In re Rivera). Chapter 13OPINION & ORDERBefore this court is Plaintiff Cooperativa de Ahorro y Credito de Caguas' ("COOP") Motion for Summary Judgment; Motion Submitting Documents; and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkts. No. 12, 13, 14]. This motion was unopposed by the Page 2 Defendants despite receiving notice1 of the Motion and time to object. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in part.The role of summary judgment is to look behind the facade of the pleadings and assay the parties' proof in order to determine whether a trial is required. Under Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 56(c), made applicable in bankruptcy by Fed. R.
7-abr-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR1046373790
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Oriental Bank v. Lopez (In re Lopez)
Oriental Bank v. Lopez (In re Lopez). Chapter 11OPINION & ORDERBefore this Court is Plaintiff Oriental Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 41]. This Motion was technically unopposed by the Defendant despite receiving notice1 of the Motion and time to object. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, in part.Page 2 The role of summary judgment is to look behind the facade of the pleadings and assay the parties' proof in order to determine whether a trial is required. Under Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 56(c), made applicable in bankruptcy by Fed. R. Bankr. P., Rule 7056, a summary judgment is available if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the
5-abr-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR1602496414
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Empresas Martinez Valentin Corp. v. PC P.R. LLC (In re Empresas Martinez Valentin Corp.)
Empresas Martinez Valentin Corp. v. PC P.R. LLC (In re Empresas Martinez Valentin Corp.). OPINION AND ORDERI. Procedural History.Empresas Martínez Valentín Corp. ("Empresas Martínez," "debtor," or "plaintiff") is a Puerto Rico corporation that owns real property in Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico, containing a gasoline service station. The property was subject to a long-term lease agreement entered into by the prior owner with Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc., which has since changed its name to PC Puerto Rico, LLC ("PC Puerto Rico").1Page 2 On August 19, 2011, Empresas Martínez filed a petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. (Bankr. Dkt. No. 1.) Shortly thereafter, on August 31, 2011, the debtor filed
4-abr-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR2109377201
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Las Lomas Constr. v. P.R. Hous. Dep't (In re Las Lomas Constr.)
Las Lomas Constr. v. P.R. Hous. Dep't (In re Las Lomas Constr.). OPINION AND ORDERPending before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by the Puerto Rico Housing Department (the "PRHD"). (Adv. Dkt. No. 113.) For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.I. Jurisdiction.This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a), Local Civil Rule 83K(a), and the General Order of Referral of Title 11 Proceedings to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico, dated July 19, 1984 (Torruella, C.J.).1 This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).Page 2 II.
4-abr-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR2039357363
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
In re Augusto's Cuisine Corp.
In re Augusto's Cuisine Corp.. CHAPTER 11OPINION AND ORDERThis case is before the court upon the Objection to Confirmation of Debtor's Amended Plan of Reorganization (Docket No. 127) filed by Luis Alvarez, shareholder of the Debtor (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Alvarez") and the Limited Response to Luis Alvarez's Objection to Confirmation of Debtor's Amended Plan of Reorganization (Docket No. 164) filed by the Debtor. Also before the court is the Joint Motion in Compliance with Court Order filed by the Debtor and creditor TKL Holdings III (PR), LLC (hereinafter referred to as "TKL") and Mr. Alvarez's Response to Debtor, TKL, and Mr. Rodriguez's Respective Memorandum of Law (Docket No. 174).On October 17, 2016 a confirmation hearing regarding Debtor's First Amended Plan of
28-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR1357015594
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Wiscovitch-Rentas v. Mapfre Praico Ins. Co. (In re Luis Diesel Servs., Inc.)
Wiscovitch-Rentas v. Mapfre Praico Ins. Co. (In re Luis Diesel Servs., Inc.). Chapter 7OPINION AND ORDERBefore the court is Co-Defendant Puma Energy Caribe, LLC's ("Puma") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 (b)(2) & 41(b) and for Attorney's Fees, or in the Alternative, for Plaintiff to be Precluded from Supporting its Claims [Dkt. No. 27], Co-Defendant MAPFRE PRAICO ("MAPFRE") Insurance Company's Motion to Join Co-Defendant Puma Energy Page 2 Caribe, LLS's Motion to Dismiss and for Attorney's Fees at Docket No. 27 [Dkt. No. 28] and, the appointed Chapter 7 Trustee's ("Plaintiff") Opposition to Defendants' Request for Dismissal [Dkt. No. 32]. For the reasons set forth below, Puma's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 (b)(2) & 41(b) and for
28-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR69651161
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Levis v. Rivera (In re Levis)
Levis v. Rivera (In re Levis). CHAPTER 11OPINION AND ORDERPlaintiffs Mario Samuel Levis and his spouse Joviana N. Ramos Lugo filed the adversary proceeding of caption against in rem defendant the M/V Puruca; in personam defendants Jaime Sánchez-Rivera, Vanessa Baerga Ortiz, and their conjugal partnership; and Héctor Baerga Lizardi, María de los Ángeles Ortiz, and their conjugal partnership to turnover property and money to the estate. Page 2 The plaintiffs are foreclosing a preferred ship mortgage over the M/V Puruca and collecting monies owed by the individuals defendants under loan documents. The defendants admit they owe the amounts due, but take issue with a clause in one of the promissory notes which provides for the payment of ten percent of the note's principal for expenses, costs, disbursements, and attorneys'
24-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR395543784
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Office of Gov't Ethics of P.R. v. Hernandez (In re Hernandez)
Office of Gov't Ethics of P.R. v. Hernandez (In re Hernandez). Chapter 7OPINION & ORDERBefore the court is Plaintiff, Office of Government Ethics of Puerto Rico's (hereinafter "OEG") Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 24], and Amended Statement of Material Uncontested Facts [Dkt. No. 25]. These motions were unopposed by the Debtor/Defendant despite receiving notice1 of the motions and having hadPage 2 time to object. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment is GRANTED.The role of summary judgment is to look behind the façade of the pleadings and assay the parties' proof in order to
23-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR116108611
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
In re Rivera
In re Rivera. CHAPTER 7OPINION AND ORDERThis case is before the court upon the Motion to Alter Order at Docket No. 48 and Incorporated Brief filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee (hereinafter referred to as the "Trustee") on September 1, 2016 (Docket No. 52). The Trustee requests that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) the court vacate and set aside the Order entered on July 29, 2016 (Docket No. 48) granting the Debtor's unopposed reply to the Trustee's objection to the claimed homestead exception (Docket No. 41) and grant the objection to the homestead exception filed by the Trustee. For the reasons stated below the Motion to Alter Order is hereby denied.JurisdictionThe court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(a). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
22-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR1375448294
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Rios v. Concepcion (In re Concepcion)
Rios v. Concepcion (In re Concepcion). Chapter 7OPINION & ORDERBefore this Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Count 5 of Amended Compliant ("Motion") filed on July 14, 2016 [Dkt. No. 155]. This Motion was unopposed by the Defendants despite receiving various extensions of time to oppose to the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED. Page 2 The role of summary judgment is to look behind the facade of the pleadings and assay the parties' proof in order to determine whether a trial is required. Under Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 56(c), made applicable in bankruptcy by Fed.R.Bankr.P., Rule 7056, a summary judgment is available if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that
21-mar-2017 |  US Bankruptcy Court|Bankr. P.R.  |  2017USBR585196834
Ver Resumen de Documento | Abrir Documento | Descargar Documento a mi Computador | Guardar Documento en Mi Perfil | Enviar Documento por Correo Electrónico | Buscar Documentos Similares  
 
Resultados 1 al 10 de 5511 (aprox.)Página: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>

Política de Privacidad |   Términos y Condiciones  |    @FaceBook |   @Twitter | Sitemap   |    Últimas entradas (RSS)   |    Blog Corporativo

INICIO

MI PERFIL

BÚSQUEDA POR:

QUÉ OFRECEMOS PRODUCTOS SERVICIOS AYUDA CONTÁCTANOS
 

» Prueba la nueva versión de Microjuris.com OK